<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stepping out of my comfort zone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.naget.com/2009/03/stepping-out-of-my-comfort-zone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.naget.com/2009/03/stepping-out-of-my-comfort-zone/</link>
	<description>The chronicles of naget BDFLs and friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.naget.com/2009/03/stepping-out-of-my-comfort-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naget.com/blog/?p=53#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I *really* would have liked to see some support for Ogg/Vorbis/Theora/Flac/whatever. Somewhat related: As of Microsoft Office 2007 Service Pack 2, they offer OpenDocument Format support (the format that OpenOffice uses) with the option of making it the default type to use.

I know that Windows will probably never follow the package management scheme, but I think one area of interest could be a public API for hooking your application up to Windows Update. That could alleviate a lot of projects having to implement automatic update features themselves.

Another addition could be integrating Add/Remove Programs with the Microsoft website---they could host (or point to) software on the server, list it in Add/Remove Programs, and allow you to select and install whatever looks interesting. It doesn&#039;t require them to adopt a new model for the management aspect, just some patches to existing software and a place to host stuff.

I think they&#039;re interesting ideas. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I *really* would have liked to see some support for Ogg/Vorbis/Theora/Flac/whatever. Somewhat related: As of Microsoft Office 2007 Service Pack 2, they offer OpenDocument Format support (the format that OpenOffice uses) with the option of making it the default type to use.</p>
<p>I know that Windows will probably never follow the package management scheme, but I think one area of interest could be a public API for hooking your application up to Windows Update. That could alleviate a lot of projects having to implement automatic update features themselves.</p>
<p>Another addition could be integrating Add/Remove Programs with the Microsoft website&#8212;they could host (or point to) software on the server, list it in Add/Remove Programs, and allow you to select and install whatever looks interesting. It doesn&#8217;t require them to adopt a new model for the management aspect, just some patches to existing software and a place to host stuff.</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re interesting ideas. <img src='http://blog.naget.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://blog.naget.com/2009/03/stepping-out-of-my-comfort-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naget.com/blog/?p=53#comment-33</guid>
		<description>You pointed out a fairly big issue I have with Vista (or Windows in general). The fact that it lacks pre-installed software to handle a lot of known file formats.

Codecs are also a gripe, and I expect all possible media formats to be handled by Vista automatically and Windows Update - alas, this is not the case.

You know, I never actually had these niggles until I used Ubuntu for a few months. I guess, as Windows was all we knew... we took all this crap as our due. :P

When Vista does work, it works very nicely. But it needs a bit - and sometimes a lot - of work to... work. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pointed out a fairly big issue I have with Vista (or Windows in general). The fact that it lacks pre-installed software to handle a lot of known file formats.</p>
<p>Codecs are also a gripe, and I expect all possible media formats to be handled by Vista automatically and Windows Update &#8211; alas, this is not the case.</p>
<p>You know, I never actually had these niggles until I used Ubuntu for a few months. I guess, as Windows was all we knew&#8230; we took all this crap as our due. <img src='http://blog.naget.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When Vista does work, it works very nicely. But it needs a bit &#8211; and sometimes a lot &#8211; of work to&#8230; work. <img src='http://blog.naget.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.naget.com/2009/03/stepping-out-of-my-comfort-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naget.com/blog/?p=53#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this post is a review of Windows Vista or a commentary on historical approaches to design. It started out as a review, and I really didn&#039;t mean to lose focus of that... but that&#039;s just the way things are! I guess if you want to make any conclusion from this, it&#039;s &quot;more of the same + improvements.&quot;

:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this post is a review of Windows Vista or a commentary on historical approaches to design. It started out as a review, and I really didn&#8217;t mean to lose focus of that&#8230; but that&#8217;s just the way things are! I guess if you want to make any conclusion from this, it&#8217;s &#8220;more of the same + improvements.&#8221;</p>
<p>:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
